This sub is dedicated to uncovering and discussing. Why SegWit2x (B2X) is technically inferior.
Bitcoin will continue as is and centralised spinoff coins will be increasingly undifferentiated. If a miner mines BCH Bitcoin fullnodes automatically ignore. As Vijay Boyapati says m/real_vijay/status/, when an aircraft manufacturer launches a new super jumbo, m/adam3us/status/ the executives and management and senior engineers of the manufacturer ride on the maiden voyage. Same with B2X bitcoin gold btc price chart or dogecoin. I don't know the politics yet, but I really like the community for the ability to have frank conversation. I consider a spinoff coin, like B2X, that can be changed at the private interests of 12 guys in a new york hotel room (half of who already refused to sign, left or split to promote BCH or embarrassed the others with an ICO). Wouldn't this be eating your (our?) young? I really don't get that? The few remaining NYA / B2X proponents make claims which are based on false confidence and misconstrued metrics. It is folly to seek to centralise Bitcoin, because centralised Bitcoin is not Bitcoin. Edit: can I just say how much I appreciate you guys not down-voting me into oblivion and answeringwhat might be obvious questions?
Peter thiel bitcoin investment
Lost bitcoin address
Waar bitcoins kopen